AWS Outposts alternative
Pacific vs AWS Outposts: CUI-bounded pods vs an AWS rack on-site
AWS Outposts extends AWS APIs and operations into your building. That is the right tool when the job is “make this site look like AWS.” Pacific’s on-prem path is different: managed GPU racks that physically bound CUI and reduce the infrastructure your assessor has to walk - certification stays separate.

The decision
Start with the deployment model.
Outposts wins when AWS-region parity on your floor is the requirement. Pacific wins when the requirement is a dedicated GPU boundary for CUI/ITAR-adjacent work, not an extension of a public-cloud control plane.
All comparisonsSide by side
Pacific and AWS Outposts
| Criterion | Pacific | AWS Outposts |
|---|---|---|
| Job to be done | Dedicated, managed GPU infrastructure on your premises with a smaller assessment surface. | Run AWS services on a rack AWS owns and operates in your facility. |
| Control plane | Bare-metal cluster operated by Pacific. Not an AWS Region analog. | AWS APIs, IAM, and operational model - by design. |
| CUI / scope | Physical bound for CUI; language is scope reduction only. No certification claim. | Shared AWS responsibility model extended on-prem; assessor still reasons about AWS. |
| Hardware | Reserved HGX B300-class modules sized as AI factories. | Outposts configurations AWS offers; GPU SKUs follow AWS catalog and lead times. |
| Who operates it | Pacific builds, deploys, and operates; unstaffed on site with regional field service. | AWS operates the Outpost; you operate workloads as in-region. |
| Pricing | Private. Discussed on a qualified CMMC / capacity call. | AWS Outposts pricing is public in their calculator; we do not reproduce it. |
The right fit
When each approach makes sense.
When Pacific fits
- Aerospace / defense buyers who need a CUI-bounded GPU cluster, not AWS-on-the-floor.
- The assessor’s problem is infrastructure scope, and a dedicated module helps reduce it.
- You want reserved B300-class training/inference hardware, not an Outposts SKU.
When AWS Outposts fits
- The hard requirement is AWS service parity (same APIs, IAM, ops) inside the building.
- Your estate is already standardized on AWS and Outposts is the approved pattern.
- You need AWS-managed hardware refresh and do not want a third operator.
Diligence
Confirm the details that decide the fit.
This comparison describes product positioning and deployment differences. Vendor catalogs, capacity, and terms can change. Confirm current details directly with each provider; competitor pricing is not reproduced or estimated.
Pacific deployment timing and configuration are confirmed site by site. On-prem CUI scope reduction is separate from certification.
Continue reading
The next conversation
Make the comparison specific to your deployment.
Review the capacity, site requirements, and acceptance plan with Pacific.
Discuss your deployment