04 / On-premises GPU infrastructure
Sensitive AI. A defined boundary.
A managed cluster of GPU racks on your premises. Physically bound Controlled Unclassified Information and reduce the infrastructure scope your team must assess.
The application
Make the boundary legible.
For teams evaluating on-premises infrastructure for CUI and ITAR-controlled work. Start with the environment, responsibilities, and interfaces.
- 01
Physical scope
Keep sensitive workloads within a defined on-premises environment. A smaller boundary can reduce the infrastructure your team needs to assess.
- 02
Responsibility map
Map physical and boundary control responsibilities between Pacific and your organization for review with your security team.
- 03
Your program
Organizational controls, policies, people, training, and assessment remain your responsibility. Infrastructure does not confer certification.
Reference specification
On your premises. Explicit interfaces.
Typical entry deployments use 8 to 16 managed GPU nodes. Pod 32 is a separate, deeper reference for larger deployments.
Explore the technology| Typical entry | 8-16 managed GPU nodes |
|---|---|
| Location | Customer premises |
| Operations | Pacific managed |
| Boundary | Defined CUI environment |
| Validation | Factory, site, integration gates |
| Larger reference | Pod 32: 32 Supermicro HGX B300 nodes |
| Reference storage | 983 TB raw NVMe per module |
| Reference fabric | Configurable 3.2 or 6.4 Tbps per node |
Engineering and operations
Evidence for your review.
Control responsibilities
A control-responsibility map makes system ownership and physical and boundary responsibilities explicit. Assessment remains a separate program.
Technical acceptance
Witnessable evidence from a 24-stage factory, site, and integration test program supports technical review. These are infrastructure artifacts, not certification documents.
Operating interfaces
Review identity, data transfer, administration, and field service with your security team. Isolation and air-gap requirements are site-specific engineering inputs.
Start a conversation
A little context. A useful call.
Three short questions, then choose a time. No project names or sensitive details needed.
Question 1 of 3
Your role
Only broad answer categories are recorded. Keep sensitive project details for the conversation.
Book without the questions Open Cal.com in a new tabFurther detail
Before we talk.
Does buying Pacific infrastructure complete our CMMC program?
No. The deployment physically bounds CUI and can reduce the infrastructure scope your team must assess. Assessment, organizational controls, policies, and people remain your program. No infrastructure purchase confers certification.
What does the deployment actually cover?
A managed cluster of typically 8 to 16 GPU nodes dropped on your site and operated by Pacific. Physical and boundary control responsibilities are mapped for review with your security team, while organizational obligations remain with your program.
How do remote operations work with sensitive data?
Identity, data-transfer, and administrative interfaces are documented and reviewed with your security team before deployment. Field service follows the same defined interfaces. Responsibility for each interface is mapped explicitly.
Can the deployment be isolated or air-gapped?
Connectivity and isolation requirements are addressed in the engineering design for your site and program constraints. Bring the requirement to the engineering call - it is a design input, not an afterthought.
What evidence supports our assessment?
Infrastructure acceptance evidence from a 24-stage factory, site, and integration test program with named gates, plus a control-responsibility map covering the physical and boundary controls. These are technical evidence artifacts, not certification documents.